Pros: The unique, ironic premise of out-of-control science is still fresh and relevant to our present age; Terence Fisher's direction shows flashes of a talent that would make Hammer world famous for its horror films.
Cons: Some will find the pacing slow and the production design of the laboratory "slapdash."
Terence Towles Canote is hosting his 13th annual Rule Britannia Blogathon over at A Shroud of Thoughts, wherein bloggers are invited to write about any British film or any topic related to Britain's contributions to film. Not being particularly superstitious, I signed on to this year's event with the thought that not only would I write about a British film, I'd write about one in which Britannia indeed rules, at least in terms of its setting and plot.
An obvious choice would be an adventure or war film set at the height of Great Britain's empire, but since this blog is focused on sci-fi and horror, and since I'm not a big fan of empires, you'll have to go elsewhere for that sort of thing. Nope, Four Sided Triangle has no sword fights, broadsides between sailing ships, or any of the derring-do that you might normally associate with a phrase like "Rule Britannia."
In place of daring action, Four Sided Triangle features a daring idea that, brought to fruition by two unassuming British inventors, has the capacity to revolutionize the world economy and life in general. "A load of rubbish!" you say? "Nothing earth shattering or innovative came out of Britain after it was exhausted by two world wars and could only manage to shed itself of its costly empire!" you say? Well, Hammer Films, and reality, beg to differ.
I'll let Bill Bryson, American expatriate and travel writer, speak to the British innovative spirit (if not their marketing genius):
"The British are an ingenious race. There can be no question about that. Their contribution to the world's comfort and knowledge are way beyond what, measured proportionately, ought to come off a little island in the North Sea. Some years ago, Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry made a study of national inventiveness and concluded that in the modern era Britain had produced 55 percent of all the world's 'significant inventions,' against 22 percent for the United States and 6 percent for Japan. ... It is remarkable how often Britons invent or discover something of great value, then fail to cash in on it. The list of things invented, discovered, or developed in Britain that benefited Britain barely or not at all includes computers, radar, the endoscope, the zoom lens, holography, in vitro fertilization, animal cloning, magnetically levitated trains, and Viagra." [Bill Bryson, The Little Road to Dribbling, Doubleday, 2015, pp. 148, 150.]
In the first half of the 1950s, before Hammer Films went all in on Gothic horror, the studio echoed that innovative spirit with several black and white sci-fi films. While American sci-fi movie heroes were set back on their heels battling space invaders (It Came from Outer Space, 1953) and giant monsters unleashed by atomic tests (The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, 1953; Them!, 1954), British protagonists were proactively preparing rockets for the first piloted flights into space (The Quatermass Xperiment, 1955; Spaceways, 1954).
![]() |
| Okay, so the spacecraft in The Quatermass Xperiment ended up nosediving into the ground, but still... brilliant! |
And most unusual of all (if not quite as glamorous or terrifying), British inventors Bill and Robin (Stephen Murray and John Van Eyssen, respectively) were perfecting their ground-breaking matter duplicator in Four Sided Triangle. The film invests heavily in the romantic notion, so beloved by sci-fi filmmakers and fans, of the lone, eccentric inventor (or mad scientist) making earth-shattering discoveries in his remote laboratory, unhindered by the prying eyes of the uncomprehending masses.
Okay, so in this case it takes two to tango with the laws of science and dance the two step with things better left alone, but there's still a healthy helping of suspended disbelief necessary to accept that these pioneering tech bros have managed to make matter out of energy in a converted barn in the middle of the English countryside. (AI tech bros take note: Bill and Robin have also apparently figured out how to do their scientific magic without hogging their neighbors' electricity and water. Also noteworthy: the pair's fictional breakthrough predated by several years Andre Delambre's notorious experiments with matter teleportation in 1958's The Fly.)
The men may be scientific geniuses, but in matters of love and life they're a little less whippy. As narrated by the village's kindly (and somewhat busybody-ish) doctor Harvey (James Hayter), in their childhood Bill and Robin had been thick as thieves with a local girl, Lena. Inevitably, the trio had broken up -- the two boys going off to university to learn how to upend the laws of physics, and Lena (Barbara Payton) emigrating to America with her mother (thus explaining the actress' American accent). Just as the geniuses were perfecting their invention, Lena had returned to the bucolic village where she grew up, confiding to the doctor that she considered herself a failure, and had only returned to sell off her deceased mother's things in order to scrape by for a few more years.
![]() |
| Everyone's happy that the childhood friends have been reunited... well, maybe not everyone. |
Lena's path veers in a direction she could never have imagined when Bill and Robin demonstrate their matter duplicator to her and Dr. Harvey by exactly reproducing the good doctor's pocket watch. With the success, Robin's wealthy and influential father Sir Walter instantly becomes an enthusiastic investor instead of a reluctant one (the good doctor -- ever supportive of the lads -- had sold his practice to provide more capital for the experiments after Sir Walter had turned his son down, not wanting to throw "good money after bad.")
At this point, Lena has become, in the words of the sentimental doctor, "cook, nurse, confessor, chief bottle washer, and occasional mechanic to those two conspirators." (Patronizing, but then this was 1953.) But unfortunately for Bill, she's not above playing favorites, up to and including handing over her heart to good old, smiling, guileless Robin. And who could blame this woman who, just a short while ago, had been at poverty's door and been so down on herself?
As we learn from the doctor's narration, Bill had been born on the wrong side of the tracks (I guess in this case, the wrong side of the hedgerow), and had grown up with an abusive, alcoholic father. While possessing a brilliant mind, he's also alternately taciturn, impulsive and impolitic, at one point telling his partner he's already bored with their invention and ready to move on. By contrast, Robin is enthusiastic, optimistic and practical (not to mention handsome and rich).
Poor long-faced Bill doesn't stand a chance. Instead of talking to Lena, Bill confides in the doctor about his love for her, and in his hesitation, loses out when Robin and Lena announce their engagement at a dinner party celebrating the team's success.
![]() |
| Handsome, wealthy and charismatic Robin is smiling like the cat that ate the canary. |
After the wedding, practical Robin is off to London to negotiate more money, equipment and security arrangements with the government, while Bill stews in his bitter disappointment. But, in the grand tradition of the genre, you can't keep a mad scientist down for long, even a depressed one, and before you know it, Bill, with the aid of the conflicted and worried Doc Harvey, is experimenting with guinea pigs and rabbits to take the invention to its logical conclusion -- the duplication of living organisms.
"I think you know where I'm going with this," Bill tells the doctor, who at first refuses to help with the mad scheme. But sure enough, Harvey's scientific curiosity gets the better of him, and soon he's staring wide-eyed in amazement at the duplication of living beings. Curiosity so overtakes the doc's rational caution that he ends up convincing Lena to submit to being duplicated, assuring her that no harm will come to her. Et tu Doctor Harvey?
Also in the grand tradition of the genre, there is no way this is going to end well, and it doesn't. It's not because Bill, as a true blue mad scientist, has been reckless or careless (as in a fly in the duplicator chamber), but because he has done his job too well. Lena 2 (dubbed Helen) is a perfect replica of the original, right down to her wants, desires and... loves. Oops. Now, all Bill has to do is erase Helen's memories (along with her desires) so that the two can start over. What could possibly go wrong?
![]() |
| "Okay, back to the duplicating board..." |
The rustic country setting and the kindly doctor's voiceover narration initially lend an almost quaint fairytale atmosphere to the film. Early on we know a reckoning is coming with the reuniting of the childhood friends, but the mood is as light as the sun on an English meadow. Director Terence Fisher does some interesting shot blocking, giving Bill a physical prominence that suggests that he is the more valuable member of the inventor duo (in one scene in the converted barn laboratory, Bill is standing on a platform, visually dominating the other characters as if his scientific prowess has made him King of his own little world).
But once it becomes obvious that Lena has chosen between her childhood pals, Triangle trades in its day-lit quaintness for the Gothic darkness and brooding that is the hallmark of mad science. As Bill becomes more haggard and desperate in his quest to reclaim (or more accurately, reproduce) his lost love, nighttime takes over, and the barn/laboratory grows darker even as new equipment for duplicating human beings fills up the space.
The production designers go full on Frankenstein with Bill's lair, and the bubbling beakers, lights and assorted levers and dials on the equipment panels harken back to Universal's Gothic labs while prefiguring the Hammer Films domain that Peter Cushing as Frankenstein would thrive in several years later. A couple of shots of Bill's under-lit face as the machinery buzzes and flashes around him, make him seem far madder and ominous than Colin Clive or Peter Cushing. (Interestingly, for all the equipment in the lab, there's nary a computer in sight or a reference to one, even though by the early '50s mainframes were fairly well known in popular culture. It's truly mad, magical science that can create matter out of energy without the help of a computer.)
![]() |
| You can't have mad science without a bubbling beaker. |
Of course, every mad scientist needs a loyal assistant, and Doc Harvey steps in as one of the more gentle and erudite assistants to help expedite a barkin' mad scheme. Before there's any mention of duplicating living beings (not to mention beautiful Lena), the doctor is excited at the prospect of cheaply duplicating expensive or rare medicines for the benefit of humanity. But then, his empathy for poor "wrong-side-of-the-tracks" Bill and an innate human curiosity override his caution, and soon he's pulling levers and twisting dials to help in the dangerous work of replicating living things. (You also have to wonder if the doctor is himself smitten with the beautiful creature Lena has become, and would have been as enthusiastic if the human guinea pig had been someone else.)
In real life, Barbara Payton (Lena) was no stranger to love triangles, four sided or of the more conventional kind. In 1951, at the height of her brief Hollywood career, she was sharing her affections with two actors simultaneously, Franchot Tone and Tom Neal, which resulted in a vicious fight between the two men that sent Tone to the hospital. She married Tone, but after only seven weeks went back to the handsome but brutish Neal. Along the way, she wracked up affairs with the likes of Gary Cooper, Bob Hope, John Ireland, Howard Hughes and Guy Madison (not to mention five marriages). [IMDb] Incautiously burning her candle at both ends, she most definitely could have used a machine for duplicating herself.
With scandal haunting her in the U.S., Payton traveled to London to make two films for Hammer, one of which was Four Sided Triangle. While she was very graciously received by Hammer chairman James Carreras and son Michael, unfortunately the two bottom-of-the-bill B movies did nothing for her career, and by the mid-'50s she was immersed in alcohol, drugs and petty larceny; tragically she would succumb to heart and liver failure at the age of 39.
Payton biographer John O'Dowd is pretty harsh on the film and Barbara's performance:
"As the lone American in a provincial setting, Barbara delivered a distracted performance, leading one to believe she had only taken the job as a temporary diversion from her nightclubbing activities in London. ... In a prosaic bit of pap like this, Barbara must have felt she was under no obligation to extend any more than the most rudimentary effort ... and it showed. Additionally hampered by a stagnant, creeping pace and its slapdash special effects (the latter aptly described by author Philip Strick in his book, Science Fiction Movies, as 'flashing lights and cork-screws'), Four Sided Triangle proved a crashing bore and did nothing for Barbara's career." [John O'Dowd, Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye: The Barbara Payton Story, BearManor Media, 2006, p. 225]
![]() |
| In the grand tradition of British science, Bill works feverishly on an invention from which he will not profit in the slightest. |
On the flip side of fate, Triangle's director and co-writer Terence Fisher would go on to helm some of Hammer's best and most iconic horror films, starting with The Curse of Frankenstein (1957), and following up with a parade of classic monsters: Horror of Dracula (1958), The Mummy (1958), The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960), The Curse of the Werewolf (1961), The Phantom of the Opera (1962), and The Gorgon (1964), among a slew of others.
In writing about Four Sided Triangle, film scholar Peter Hutchings is not nearly as dismissive as O'Dowd, and he finds some interesting character dynamics and ideas in the modest B programmer:
"[F]our Sided Triangle is that rare beast, a pre-1956 British science fiction film. While it follows Spaceways in privileging romantic relationships over scientific investigation, it nevertheless embraces more thoroughly some of the ideas and conventions associated with the SF genre. ... As is the case with those other pre-1956 Fisher films that are distinctive in some way or other, there appears to be conservative tone to the proceedings here. A comment made by the old doctor in Four Sided Triangle might well stand for the aspect of the work generally: 'There is often less danger in the things we fear than in the things we desire.'" [Peter Hutchings, Terence Fisher: British Film Makers, Manchester University Press, 2001, pp. 63, 67.]
While Four Sided Triangle can't be counted among Hammer's classics, this modest black and white film benefits from a unique, ironic premise, and serves as a modern fairytale-like warning that love can't be understood or captured by rationality and science. Maybe in the age of runaway AI simulacra flooding our culture and erasing the boundaries between humans and machines, we need this message more than ever.
![]() |
| "Damn, there's a fly buzzing around the laboratory! Now where did I put the flyswatter?" |








































