April 13, 2024

Sleuthing with the B Movie Stars: Ginger Rogers in The Thirteenth Guest

Now Playing:
The Thirteenth Guest (1932)


Pros: Good, energetic cast seems to be having fun with the material; The mad killer has a highly unusual modus operandi.
Cons: Plot is bewilderingly complex and ultimately doesn't make much sense

This post is part of the second annual "Favorite Stars in B Movies" blogathon hosted by Yours Truly. You won't want to miss all the other great posts about the stars who lit up the Bs, right here on this site!

"Sure he [Fred Astaire] was great, but don't forget that Ginger Rogers did everything he did, ...backwards and in high heels." - Bob Thaves, Frank and Ernest (cartoon, 1982)

Ginger Rogers, the epitome of grace and beauty in some of Hollywood’s greatest, most beloved musicals, was apparently born to dance: "My mother told me I was dancing before I was born. She could feel my toes tapping wildly inside her for months." [Ginger Rogers, Ginger Rogers: My Story, 1991)

But in the Hollywood of the 1930s, desire and natural ability were not nearly enough -- to become a larger-than-life dancer on the big screen, you had to have the grit and determination of a Visigoth, and Rogers had that in spades.

Even though Rogers won a best actress Oscar for her dramatic portrayal of Kitty Foyle (1940), for better or worse (for richer or poorer, in sickness or in health, for as long as there are fans who remember…) she will always be best known for tripping the light fantastic with Fred Astaire in ten films.

Interestingly, it was Ginger Rogers -- barely into her 20s and 12 years younger than her new dance partner -- who was the grizzled movie veteran when she and Astaire first paired up in Flying Down to Rio (1933). Rogers had over two dozen movies on her resume at the time, while Astaire was just getting started, having appeared in only one other.

Leading up to that breakout appearance, Rogers might have thought she was moving backwards in high heels as far as her movie career was concerned. For every small part in an A picture like 42nd Street or Gold Diggers of 1933, there was seemingly an endless supply of roles (albeit some leading ones) in uninspired Bs like The Sap from Syracuse or Carnival Boat.

The Thirteenth Guest came a little over mid-way through Roger’s marathon run through the Bs in the early part of her career. But unlike The Sap from Syracuse and its ilk, The Thirteenth Guest has stayed around, kicked up its feet and made itself at home -- as in home video releases.

At first glance, it may not be exactly clear why The Thirteenth Guest made it all the way to home video while most of Rogers’ other Bs fell by the wayside. Produced at Monogram Pictures, one of the  “Poverty Row” studios of Hollywood’s Golden Age that specialized in churning out Bs, The Thirteenth Guest was based on a 1929 novel by noted crime author Armitage Trail (aka, Maurice R. Coons, best known for his novel Scarface, later turned into the hit 1932 movie with Paul Muni).

The Thirteenth Guest is highly reminiscent of 1927’s popular mystery-thriller The Cat and the Canary, which itself was based on a successful play from the early ‘20s. (The Cat and the Canary is supposed to have influenced James Whale’s brilliant dark comedy The Old Dark House, and both in turn influenced a whole generation of “old dark house” films.)

Guest and Cat rely on a familiar set-up: after the death of a wealthy patriarch, the potential heirs gather like vultures at the creepy old ancestral mansion to find out who is to inherit the fortune. When the guests start getting bumped off one-by-one, fear, loathing and suspicion erupt among the survivors.

Poster - The Cat and the Canary (1927)
The Cat and the Canary set the stage for the madness of The Thirteenth Guest.

Whereas The Cat and The Canary injected yet another soon-to-be cliche into the mix -- a homicidal maniac on the loose -- The Thirteenth Guest went with a more subtle (?) form of madness.

Guest tries to distinguish itself with about as complicated a plot as you could possibly cram into a 70 minute B picture. Thirteen years ago the patriarch of the Morgan family had invited thirteen of his closest friends, relatives and confidantes (including the family lawyer Barksdale) to his mansion for a dinner party, where he was to reveal the details of his will. It seems the bulk of his estate was to go to a mysterious, unnamed thirteenth guest, but the guest never showed up and the elderly Morgan died (or was murdered) before the person’s identity could be revealed.

In the film’s present day, Marie Morgan (Rogers), daughter of the deceased millionaire, has just turned 21, and for some reason is poking around the now deserted mansion. Although the house was long ago abandoned after the elder Morgan’s death, someone has turned the electricity back on, installed a working telephone, and set up the dining room exactly as it was thirteen years ago.

In classic old dark house fashion, a scream rips the night, whereupon the panicked cab driver who delivered Marie to the house takes off to summon the police. Police Captain Ryan (J. Farrell MacDonald) and his numbskull assistant Detective Grump (Paul Hurst) discover Marie’s dead body, seated at the dining table as if waiting for other guests to arrive.

Screenshot - Ginger Rogers and Lyle Talbot in The Thirteenth Guest (1932)
"She died waiting for the hors d'oeuvres to be served..."

Captain Ryan, who immediately realizes he needs more brain power on the case, calls in a brilliant, snarky playboy/private investigator, Phil Winston (Lyle Talbot) to help sort it all out. Marie’s brother Harold (James Eagles) identifies his sister’s body, but soon everyone is floored when Marie, very much alive, shows up at the scene of the murder.

What ensues next is a crazy, serpentine plot involving cryptic notes, a surgically altered double of Marie (the first dead body), the arrival of the rest of the guests who had attended the original dinner party, multiple people conspiring to get their hands on the will, more dead bodies neatly placed in the spots at the table that they had occupied thirteen years ago, and a masked, hooded killer who spies on people from a hidden room and electrocutes his victims with the normal-looking telephone that he has wired up to a switch.

Whew! You need a scorecard to keep track of it all (but then, I’m at that age where I sometimes lose the plot just watching TV commercials). Fortunately, Detective Grump is around to provide comic relief and reassure those of us who worry about losing it that there are always unfortunate souls in a sorrier state.

Grump is so oafish and inept that he seems outrageous even for a pre-code B movie, but at one point a character helpfully points out that he got his position through an influential family member. You will either cringe or smile in wry bemusement at Grump’s attempts at comic relief. Subtle he is not. In one scene, a telephone rings, and distracted, Grump picks up his revolver and puts it to his ear. In another that has to be seen to be believed, he tries to imitate a strange cry he heard emanating from the mansion for the benefit of Capt. Ryan and Winston:

Supplementing Grump’s antics is the usual assortment of ‘30s character cut-outs. The police captain is both out of his depth and constantly exasperated by the even greater incompetence of his subordinates. Winston, the playboy police consultant, has more smarts in his little finger than the entire police force, and wears a knowing smirk along with the chic suits he sports throughout the film. (A relative newcomer in 1932, Lyle Talbot would go on to become one of the most dependable and long-lasting character actors in Hollywood history, racking up hundreds of movie and TV appearances before retiring in the late ‘80s.)

And of course, no film like this would be complete without a wisecracking dame or two. In a great scene that sums up the less-than-stellar collective character of the Morgan family and its hangers-on (Marie excepted of course), Marjorie (Frances Rich), one of the original thirteen guests, blithely comments to Winston: “We’d all cut each other’s throats for a dime…” -- to which Marie’s brother responds, “Why a dime? I’d cut yours for the fun of it!” (No doubt, Depression-era audiences were amused by seeing how petty and cutthroat high society types could be.)

Screenshot - Lyle Talbot and Frances Rich in The Thirteenth Guest (1932)
"Let's raise a glass to all the little people who helped make this picture a success!"

At this juncture in her career, Rogers’ bright, engaging presence had earned her star billing in smaller films like this. In The Thirteenth Guest, she got the opportunity to play dual roles: as Lela, the unfortunate imposter who is the first victim of the masked killer, and as Marie, the innocent, good-hearted heiress who is the last intended victim.

Rogers breezes in and out of scenes with panache, wearing the latest ‘30s fashions and providing a beaming, blonde contrast to the rest of the sour, dark-haired women of the Morgan clan. But this is not a Ginger Rogers movie per se -- some of the cast members, including Talbot/Winston and Hurst/Grump have as much or more screen time. But of course Rogers is there at the climax to escape certain death, and to fall languorously into the arms of Winston at the end.

Screenshot - Lyle Talbot and Ginger Rogers in the final scene of The Thirteenth Guest (1932)
"You're alright even if you can't dance."

The Thirteenth Guest got a fairly positive reception in its day. Variety’s reviewer found the movie “vastly superior to many of the mystery themes produced by major companies during the past two years. Its story is even more complex, but it is so brought to the screen that it disentangles without befuddling entertainment qualities and confusing the audience to the point of distraction.” [Waly, Variety, September, 1932, p. 20] (The film proved popular enough to inspire another low-budget remake, The Mystery of the Thirteenth Guest, released in 1943.)

I can’t guarantee you won’t be befuddled -- I felt more like Grump than Winston at various points in the movie -- but if you can appreciate things like a masked madman electrocuting unsuspecting high society types and carefully placing their corpses at a decked-out dinner table, it’s an entertaining form of befuddlement. And of course, there’s the presence of future superstar Ginger Rogers to make you forget that it doesn’t make any sense.

Where to find it: Streaming | DVD

Screenshot - The hooded madman spying on his next victim in The Thirteenth Guest
In the era before social media apps, intrepid madmen had to rely on secret rooms and peepholes to spy on their intended victims.

"The calls are coming from inside the house!" Oops, wrong movie.

31 comments:

  1. This does sound like a good twisty movie and for some reason I thought it was an Agatha Christie whodunnit. Thanks for such a fun blogathon and glad you making this a yearly thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Gill! Agatha Christie was definitely influenced by things like 13th Guest and The Cat and the Canary, but she took the theme to a whole new level. I've had a blast this time around, and I hope everyone else has too.

      Delete
  2. Ginger Rogers -- what a great choice for this blogathon. She was great in Tight Spot, too. Like Gene Kelly, she certainly could do more than dance.

    Thanks so much for hosting this fun blogathon. I, too, am glad that your are making it an annual event.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Marianne! Ginger made perhaps more B's (as they're classically defined) than any other Oscar-winning A-lister. I saw Tight Spot a little while ago, and she is indeed terrific in it.
      Glad you enjoyed the blogathon!

      Delete
  3. Oh this movie sounds like a blast. I just found it and saved it to my queue!! Thank you for the great review!!! xox

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure you'll get a kick out of it! You might want to make a double feature out of it and A Shriek in the Night (see The Flashback Fanatic's comment below). And thanks for the kind words!

      Delete
  4. Thanks for this. I didn't know about Ginger Roger's secret history in B movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like a lot of big institutions, Hollywood didn't really know what they had in Rogers until it was almost too late. But fortunately luck and pluck paired her with Astaire in Flying Down to Rio, and their dance number in that film got the public's attention.

      Delete
  5. Great write up on a crazily contrived bit of old-dark-house hokum. This mystery/horror sub-genre can be a lot of fun. I am
    convinced if I rewatch this flick often enough that I will be able to make sense of it all.
    Director Albert Ray's Ginger Rogers/Lyle Talbot starring 1933 follow-up, A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT, is a better showcase for Rogers. There is a more entertaining chemistry between her character and Talbot's, as well.
    Bravo for the blogathon, Brian!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Be careful Flash, thinking you can make sense of it is the way to madness! 🤪
      Thanks for the tip about A Shriek in the Night -- I've got to reacquaint myself with that one. This was a lot of fun, and I hope you can participate next year.

      Delete
  6. I'm another one who's seen Ginger Rogers in A Shriek in the Night, which I loved, but this one you've reviewed is new to me. It sounds terrific, and who cares if it doesn't completely make sense? I know I'll like it, so thanks in advance!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the important thing is that this film is energetic and fun, and there's plenty of '30s-style snappy repartee as an added bonus. Enjoy!

      Delete
  7. Great review, Brian!
    This is one of those rare occasions where I've actually seen the film you're reviewing! It's been a while, but I remember enjoying the 13th guest, especially the cutting each other's throat remark! I'm not sure what that says about me that that is what I remember the most, but it was very amusing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks John! All I can say is that verbal exchange jumped out at me too, and I considered making a clip out of it -- but Grump's "Tarzan" yell was too tempting. 😄

      Delete
  8. Wow, you gotta admire Ginger Rogers' gumption to stick it out in films like this one before making it big. Enjoyed your review, especially describing the antecedents to this particular movie, and how, though explaining the plot, you don't give anything away! It sounds like the kind of mystery (the old dark house) that really isn't made anymore, yet it was so popular in its day. And it's amazing how much narrative pre-Code films could fit into a limited running time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Rogers was amazingly resilient, plowing through dozens of Bs that would have sent lesser would-be stars packing. I love the mix of humor and chills in classic old dark house movies -- a combination that is hard to pull off, but that many films in the genre have done very well.

      Delete
  9. Excellent review, Brian! I have a special love for these old Monogram flicks, and this is made special by the presence of Ginger. She was so wonderful. She brought energy and fun to every movie she was in. It's amazing how many of these B movies managed to have such convoluted story lines. I generally give up trying to figure everything out after the first fifteen minutes. It's more fun just to sit back and listen to the wisecracks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! That is the perfect strategy for enjoying '30s films Mike, just sit back and enjoy the banter!

      Delete
  10. Have to admit when I think of Ginger all I ever think of is Astaire-Rogers, not my cup of tea. But this one seems worth a shot.

    Quiggy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not a big musicals fan either, but over the years I've come to appreciate some of the classic dance numbers for their sheer athleticism and artistry.
      The Thirteenth Guest and A Shriek in the Night (mentioned in some of the comments) are a lot of fun and right in our wheelhouse!

      Delete
  11. Great review, Brian! Whew... I admire your attempt to sum up the plot. I gather that it's best to just go along for the ride. Sounds like fun to me! Thanks again for hosting such a fun blogathon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Barry! Yep, this one is a "take off your thinking cap and just go along for the ride" type of film.

      Delete
  12. I tried to get this film for my Halloween project last year, mistaking it for The 13th Chair (Tod Browning film with Lugosi). I think you probably got the better deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny you should mention The Thirteenth Chair! After watching Thirteenth Guest I was a bit confused, having been pretty sure that the film was centered around a seance. Now I realize I had mistaken it for the Tod Browning film!

      Delete
  13. I'm going to have to look for this one--I like "The Cat And the Canary."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure you'll get a kick out of it Rebecca, if only for all the sharp patter going on between the characters!

      Delete
  14. What a wonderful choice for a fantastic blogathon! I love the idea of a double feature with A Shriek in the Night! Sometimes there's nothing like a good Old Dark House trope. I adore Ginger Rogers and feel like I have to revisist this befuffled little gem! Thanks Brian for getting us all together to celebrate our beloved Bs!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Joey! The Thirteenth Guest has been banished to the kids' table when it comes to talking about foundational Old Dark House films, but it's well worth (re)visiting.

      Delete
  15. Aw, man! I love the vibe from old dark house films but still haven't seen The Thirteenth Guest, A Shriek in the Night, or The Cat and the Canary. I feel like I'm missing out on all the fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My all-time favorite is still James Whale's The Old Dark House ('32), and I even have a certain soft spot for William Castle's 1963 "re-make" (but let's just keep that between ourselves!).

      Delete
    2. I love Whale's The Old Dark House. I have the William Castle remake on BluRay but haven't managed to watch it yet (partially because all the negative feedback has put me off).

      Delete